Sopa Pictures | Lightrocket | Getty Pictures
Reddit, the favored community-focused discussion board, has launched a authorized problem in opposition to Australia’s social media ban for teenagers beneath 16, arguing that the newly enacted regulation is ineffective and goes too far by proscribing political dialogue on-line.
In its utility to Australia’s Excessive Court docket, the social information and aggregation platform mentioned the regulation is “invalid on the idea of the implied freedom of political communication,” saying that it burdens political communication.
Canberra’s ban got here into impact on Wednesday and focused 10 main companies, together with Alphabet‘s YouTube, Meta’s Instagram, ByteDance’s TikTok, Reddit, Snapchat and Elon Musk’s X. All focused platforms had agreed to adjust to the coverage to various levels.
Australia’s Prime Minister’s workplace, Lawyer-Basic’s Division and different social media platforms didn’t instantly reply to requests for remark.
Below the regulation, the focused platforms should take “cheap steps” to forestall underage entry, utilizing age–verification strategies reminiscent of inference from on-line exercise, facial estimation through selfies, uploaded IDs, or linked financial institution particulars.
Reddit’s utility to the courts seeks to both declare the regulation invalid or exclude the platform from the provisions of the regulation.
In an announcement to CNBC, Reddit mentioned that whereas it agrees with the significance of defending individuals beneath 16, the regulation may isolate teenagers “from the power to have interaction in age-appropriate neighborhood experiences (together with political discussions).”
It additionally mentioned in its utility that the regulation “burdens political communication,” saying “the political beliefs of kids inform the electoral decisions of many present electors, together with their dad and mom and their lecturers, in addition to others within the views of these quickly to achieve the age of maturity.”
The platform additionally argued that it shouldn’t be topic to the regulation, saying it operates extra as a discussion board for adults facilitating “data sharing” between customers than as a standard social community, saying that it doesn’t import contact lists or deal with books.
“Reddit is considerably completely different from different websites that permit for customers to grow to be “buddies” with each other, or to put up pictures about themselves, or to organise occasions,” the platform mentioned in its utility.
Reddit additional mentioned in its court docket submitting that the majority content material on its platform is accessible with out an account, and identified an individual beneath the age of 16 “could be extra simply shielded from on-line hurt if they’ve an account, being the very factor that’s prohibited.”
“That’s as a result of the account could be topic to settings that restrict their entry to explicit sorts of content material which may be dangerous to them,” it provides.
Regardless of its objections, Reddit mentioned that the problem was not an try and keep away from complying with the regulation, nor was it an effort to retain younger customers for enterprise causes.
“There are extra focused, privacy-preserving measures to guard younger individuals on-line with out resorting to blanket bans,” the platform mentioned.
— CNBC’s Dylan Butts and Stephen Desaulniers contributed to this story.
